Skip to content

Sabermetrics 101: WAR (Wins Above Replacement)

WAR is an acronym for wins above replacement. The concept is simple. Each player in some way contributes to his team’s win or loss. Hitters contribute by scoring runs and pitchers contribute by preventing runs. The more a player contributes to his teams wins the more valuable the player is. WAR is an attempt to quantify how much each player contributes to his teams wins. It does so by comparing his performance against the performance a team could expect to get if it had to replace the player. Typically, if a team has to replace a player they do so with a “replacement” level player. For the purposes of WAR replacement is defined as a player who’s ability is equal to a triple-A player or an available free agent.

WAR is a context neutral stat. Fangraphs explains context-neutral this way…”A context-neutral stat is one that values a given action equally no matter the circumstances in which the event occurred.” Meaning a single by the leadoff hitter in the top of the first has the same value as a game-winning single.

There are two variations of WAR. One is rWAR which is calculated by Baseball-Reference and the other is fWAR which is calculated by Fangraphs. Position player WAR is similar regardless of which site calculates it. Pitching WAR between the two can vary widely. That’s because FanGraphs uses fielding independent pitching (FIP) and baseball-reference uses runs allowed and innings. Any reference to WAR on this site unless specifically noted uses rWAR.

Position Player WAR

Before we can figure how many wins a player is worth we first have to calculate how many runs he’s worth. We start by comparing his performance in five different aspects of the game (batting, base running, avoiding double plays, fielding, and position specific runs, to see how much better than average the player is in each aspect. This is measured as runs above average (RAA). An average player is worth zero runs. The formula for calculating RAA is:

RAA = Rbat + Rbaser + Rdp + Rfield + Rpos

Let’s get down to it. To make the explanations and math a little easier to follow we’re going to be looking at Kenny Lofton. Lofton’s career WAR is 68.2. To give you a frame of reference that’s in the ballpark (pun intended) of contemporaries Ivan Rodriguez (68.7), Roberto Alomar (66.7), Craig Biggio (65.2) and Barry Larkin (70.2).

Over his 17 year career, Lofton collected over 2,400 hits including 383 doubles, 113 triples, 130 home runs while having a slash line of .299/.372/.423. The first piece of the WAR puzzle is batting runs. For his career, Lofton’s batting runs was 140. That’s the same as Carlos Lee and sandwiched evenly between Richie Sexton and Josh Hamilton.

RAA = 140 + Rbaser + Rdp + Rfield + Rpos

Lofton was known for his speed for good reason, he stole 622 bases and was caught stealing 160 times. He could not only fly but he was very good at stealing bases and taking the extra base. Lofton’s career 78 base running runs ranks 9th all-time tied with Joe Morgan and Lou Brock and just behind Paul Molitor (80) and Larkin (80).

RAA = 140 + 78 + Rdp + Rfield + Rpos

His speed allowed him to avoid hitting into double plays. So much so that he was worth 23 double play runs. Putting him on equal ground with Darin Erstad and a tick better than Raul Mondesi and Willie McGee and a tick behind Joe Morgan and Ozzie Smith.

RAA = 140 + 78 + 23 + Rfield + Rpos

Kenny’s defense was perhaps an underrated part of his game. His fielding was worth 104 runs above average. That puts in shouting distance of Willie Wilson and Brett Gardner and slightly higher than Curt Flood and Hank Aaron.

RAA = 140 + 78 + 23 + 104 + Rpos

To account for the fact that some positions are less demanding than others a player gets either a positional credit or debit based on his defensive position played. Lofton played his entire career in center so over his 17 seasons he was credited with 43 positional runs.

RAA = 140 + 78 + 23 + 104 + 43

When we put all those components together we have a good idea of how much better (measured by runs) Kenny Lofton was than an average player.

RAA = Rbat + Rbaser + Rdp + Rfield + Rpos

386 = 140 + 78 + 23 + 108 + 43

The average player with Lofton’s playing time was worth about 318 runs more than a replacement player. When you add those 318 runs to Lofton’s 386 runs above average you get his total runs above replacement (RAR), 704.

WAR is a measurement of wins though not runs. So, to convert RAR to wins RAR is put through a runs-to-wins converter (one win is generally equal to about 10 runs). Once the numbers are put through the converter Lofton’s WAR comes out to 68.2 WAR. That is about the same as Carlton Fisk, Ivan Rodriguez, Eddie Murray, and Ryne Sandberg.

Pitcher WAR
In the same way we used Kenny Lofton’s career stats to help explain position player WAR I’m going to use Mike Mussina to help walk us through pitching WAR. Mussina’s career WAR is 82.9. Again, for the sake of having a reference that’s the same as Fergie Jenkins and about one win better than Bob Gibson and about one win less than Nolan Ryan.

Pitching WAR is about one thing: runs allowed. During his career Mussina allowed 1,559 runs (total runs not earned runs).

Just like we did for position player WAR we first have to find how many runs above replacement (RAR)the pitcher was worth. To do so we need to find the pitcher’s RAA. Doing so is rather simple. You take runs per 9 innings for an average pitcher (RA9avg on baseball-reference) and subtract runs allowed per 9 innings (RA9 on baseball-reference). Then multiply the result by the number of innings pitched and divide by 9. The equation looks like this:

RAA = (RA9avg – RA9)*IP/9

Mussina’s looks like this:

483 = (5.16 – 3.94)*3,562.67/9

The RAA is then centered so the league average is 0. This recentering adjusts Mussina’s RAA to 463.

During the duration of his career replacement level runs allowed was 427. Adding that to his adjusted RAA OF 463 Mussina’s RAR is 890. In essence, over the course of his career, he allowed 890 fewer runs than a replacement level player would have if he pitched the same number if innings, against the same opponents, in the same ballparks, in the same league, in the same game situation, with the same defensive support.

Just like the position player WAR, once we have the pitcher’s total RAR it has to be put through a runs-to-wins converter. Mussina’s comes out to 82.9.

Since we tend to judge a pitcher on ERA, assuming the replacement level player has the same ratio of earned runs to runs (93.5%) this replacement level ERA would be 5.78 compared to Mussina’s actual 3.68.

More From Sabermetrics 101

Sabermetrics 101: A Brief Introduction

Sabermetrics 101: RE24

Sabermetrics 101: wOBA


  1. Are you telling me Mike Mussina is in any way comparable to Bob Gibson? Are you really saying that? If so you are destroying the credibility of Sabermetrics in my eyes.


    • What I did was merely point out that Mike Mussina’s career WAR is 1 win higher than Bob Gibson’s. Similar to traditional stats WAR is but one metric among dozens. You can draw your own conclusions.

      If, however, you demand an answer from me I would say that Gibson was the superior pitcher. Though I don’t think the distance between the two is as wide as most people believe. I also believe Mussina to be one of the most historically underrated pitchers of all-time.


  2. People have to realize that WAR is a counting stat for one season (in the best way to use it) and when we take it and ADD IT UPP over years we are doing some disservice to it. It’s still valuable, but as Dave points out, it’s just ONE stat that can be used to evaluate players.

    Also, players have different lengths of careers, which skews the comparisons. Sure, Mussina has a higher career WAR than Gibson, but he started more games (about 50 more). And he’s still essentially tied with Gibson in career WAR. We have to look at peak and length of peak if we want to compare players. Was Rick Reuschel more valuable than Sandy Koufax? Well, according to WAR he was by a large margin. But he had a long, consistent career pitching largely for poor-fielding teams in hitters’ parks, while andy pitched a (very) brief career in a fantastic pitchers’ park with excellent defense. WAR adjusts for that. But few people are going to argue that Reuschel was a greater pitcher.

    I also personally have a problem with two aspects of WAR. First, the positional adjustment is unfair in my opinion. It rewards infielders too much. There’s a reason so many second basemen and third baseman rank higher than we might think, it’s because they get a boost just for playing those positions, while first basemen are underrated because they are negatively punished for their position.

    Second, I am suspicious of the ballpark effects. I can’t understand why some ballparks are factored the way they are. And why (or how) does a ballpark play as favorable to pitchers one seasons and favorable to hitters the next? I think we get some funky figures because of this. Jack Morris is negatively impacted because WAR sees Tiger Stadium as a pitchers’ park. Well, anyone who watched games in that park knows that’s highly suspect. Reuschel is ranked as high as he is by WAR because Wrigley is seen as such a difficult place to pitch, but I think wind in that park also can favor the pitcher, and WAR overstates the impact it has on pitchers. Several Cubs’ pitchers are overrated via WAR.

    Thanks for this article.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: